Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IT trend today

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] IT trend today

IT trend today (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Vague, unsourced original research. Sent to AfD because a PROD was removed. Iknowyourider (t c) 04:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Patent drivel is speediable stuff. Pavel Vozenilek 05:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy - ADded tag Corpx 05:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as OR although I disagree that this can be speedied. I've removed the tag. Pascal.Tesson 05:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom--Dali-Llama 05:11, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
• Modifed as follows to satisfy the rule (JSK 05:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)):

Web 2.0 keep changing the IT trend from navigating the see of information to navigating the see of knowledge where information becomes knowledge by the human manipulation with a specific target. In the period of Web 1.0, the continuous improving of knowledge was not happened so that to get the proper knowledge, we must manupulate the information founded in the some website at the cost of not so short effort. Hence, if Web 2.0 can be perfectly deployed over the whole internet, it is almost not necessary that we generate from informations to knowledge any more; just search and find well-organized and suitable knowledge (even more well organized than how you can do). One possible drawback in practical web 2.0 systems is the potential to get "bad knowledge" because of poor objectivity or improper clarification between the finder and the generator. Note that the definition of knowledge as used here can be somehow different from the general definition of knowledge.

• Merge Merge into IT or IT Trend, this details an event constantly changing, it should be "as of June 2007" or something Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 08:20, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, an essay. John Vandenberg 08:44, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Cannot believe the speedy was removed, not only an essay but almost nonsense gibberish and clearly a joke. --Jimmi Hugh 00:27, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, interesting, but really not WP! Gold♥ 20:22, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.