Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IStockPhoto

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Though I should point out that this service is probably notable enough for a properly written article in future. -Splash^talk 23:45, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] IStockPhoto

Sadly, CSD doesn't include a provision for blatant advertising, so I'll have to put this up for deletion the slow way. --Alan Au

Also a copyvio from [1]. FreplySpang (talk) 19:53, September 9, 2005 (UTC)

I have to agree, this article looks totally useless......Sinkholeca 20:18, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - There should be speedy for blatant adverts.--Isotope23 20:38, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• No there shouldn't, because often (although far from always) such an article is about a company that is in fact notable, and a proper article can be created on the ruins of the ad. But unless someone does this promptly here. Delete this clear cut ad. DES ^(talk) 21:52, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• iDeleteAdvertising. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:11, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.