Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IRRP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE and inform the unsigned users of the procedure of the AfD process. Only speedy deletes get deleted on the same day as they are listed. — JIP | Talk 16:40, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] IRRP

I asked for reliable references/citations on Talk:IRRP but none were forthcoming; not known if this group even exists Demiurge 18:13, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, per nomination. Demiurge 18:13, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

This page was originally at IWRA; the main author of the IWRA page moved it to IRRP with the comment "IWRA moved to IRRP: IWRA does not exist" [1]. So I'm extremely dubious about the veracity of this article. Demiurge 18:39, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

• Somebody is supposedly proposing a template on the Discussion page for "deletion". I only just wrote it. Really. Somebody is obviously just following me around, to erase my stuff. On the Discussion page?! The editors ("censors") are really getting out-of-hand. (comment by 129.24.95.222)
  • Comment: article was created 8/14/05. -- Kjkolb 08:13, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as it seems to meet the WP is not a crystal ball criteria. Come back (or edit the article before it's deleted) when there's more than an unknown number of members, when the information which 'will be forthcoming in time... is forthcoming, and when the The Reformation Acts which are as yet not ready for general public release are actually encyclopædic. (all italics quoted from the article) Tonywalton  | Talk 00:04, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete

Fine, delete it. When I am authorized to contribute more information I will re-write it. Apologies for any inconvenience, - User:Wolfsangel, and User:General Heydrich

• Comment: Are you guys going to delete this page or what? What's the holdup? i made several mistakes, I realise I rushed the article, and I wasn't forthcoming about my sources, so can WE JUST DELETE IT, and I can write it again at some other point?

• Delete. "It is extremely small, with an unknown number of members." That seems to be a sufficient reason, barring any other signs of notability. -Willmcw 22:28, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.