Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IRCDig

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:44, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] IRCDig

Non-notable website; fails WP:WEB. Haakon 08:58, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, Alexa... Traffic Rank for ircdig.com: 395,091 - Motor (talk) 12:28, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as advertising for a non-notable site. -- Kicking222 12:50, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep notable is matter of opinion. Site has over 100,000 unique visitors a month. Alexa is a weak search site and using it to verify notability is a weak argument. Alexa still shows old design which was changed weeks ago. Google search results shows 16,600 results for a search on ircdig and Google gives ircdig.com a page rank of 4. I would call that notable. PackVillian 20:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Note User's only edits are to IRCDig (for which he is solely responsible), this AfD discussion, and one article where he put IRCDig at the top of a list as opposed to in the middle of it. -- Kicking222 22:38, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Note Oh boohoo, look at me, I want to remove an article that is not advertising, defamatory or insulting in any other way. Grow up people and get a life away from wikipedia. There is a whole world out there, go expereince it. PackVillian 00:47, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia ia not a platform for advertisements. Deleteme42 00:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Motor. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:23, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Why do all you care so much about deleting this article. I agree with packVillian, the article is informative and not advertising. There are numerous other similar articles for most torrent search engines. Looking through most of your guys contribs, it seems all most of you do is recommend articles for deletion. Give the guy a break. It seems well written and nuetral. And yes I registered an account specifically to comment on this but I have been a participant on wikipedia for years. KernelPanic 13:52, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.