Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPhone 2.0

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 02:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] IPhone 2.0

IPhone 2.0 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Merely a speculative list of potential features, unattributed to reliable sources, not placed in any real context for the general reader. Adequate sources for referencing an encyclopedic article on an iPhone successor are unlikely to exist right now, and any encyclopedic information that is available could reasonably included in the iPhone article. Dancter 19:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Rumors until something official is released by Apple Corpx 19:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, the iPhone hasn't yet been officially released, and an article about its successor is much too premature at this time. While it seems reasonable to me to expect the release of an upgraded iPhone in the future, it's just much too early for a Wikipedia article about it, especially with the lack of reliable sources. --Kyoko 19:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. The iPhone hasn't even launched yet, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Useight 20:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:CRYSTAL Rackabello 21:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete doesn't follow WP:NOR or WP:CRYSTAL. -- :) Chetblong 23:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete There's absolutely no verifiable information on the next iPhone yet, this article is garbage. Hemidemisemiquaver 04:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. This can be adequately covered in the main article. John Vandenberg 09:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 17:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete looks like crystal-ballism to me. Acalamari 19:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.