Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBuzz (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deletezzzzzzzz ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 08:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] IBuzz (2nd nomination)

IBuzz (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article was previously nominated in March 2006, and the discussion ended in "no consensus." Since then, the article has not become any more encyclopedic, nor has there been any additional indication of the product's notability. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 12:34, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Terence Ong 12:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep The product is no more notable, but no less notable either. The original AfD asserts a news mention and there are about a hundred thousand Ghits: not that google is the arbiter of what's notable and what isn't, but it's something to think about. Flakeloaf 13:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Ghits notwithstanding, the product does not appear to be notable enough for the encyclopædia Avi 17:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as unreferenced The article has no references at all. Delete unless actual independent, published references are provided within the article. Dugwiki 22:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for failing to establish claims per WP:V. If some reliable sources can be produced I'll reconsider. Nuttah68 14:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.