Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IA-8

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus found; decision made to redirect to 8-bit. Johnleemk | Talk 10:59, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] IA-8

Appears to be nonsense. If not nonsense, then redundant. Mirror Vax 16:33, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:37, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. The phrase IA-## didn't come into use until the 64-bit architecture was released by Intel. At that time references were made to IA-32 and IA-64 to keep the lines and technologies separate. Back in the 70's there was no reference to IA-4 or IA-8 and no reference to such on the Intel website. --StuffOfInterest 19:18, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect. If the phrase didn't exist in the past but does exist now, it would seem appropriate to focus the user mistakenly thinking IA-8 exists because IA-32 does to the correct article.--eleuthero 19:35, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

• Rename to 8-bit Intel CPU architecture. 132.205.44.134 00:41, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.