Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I2Phex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Phex. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-08 22:03Z

[edit] I2Phex

I2Phex (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Possible vanity/spam, does not appear to be notable. As ever, I am open to being proven wrong. J Milburn 11:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Simple case of no context. Article does not even state that it is software and gives us very little idea what it does. -- RHaworth 11:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge the stuff worth salvaging to Phex. Seems like a logical place to put it. MER-C 12:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge per MER-C Tuvok ^ ^{Talk | Desk | Contribs} 12:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge per MER-C Mathmo ^Talk 12:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

i2phex is still not phex, it is an own release and we want to expand this article, soon i2phex is coded in phex, then the articles can merge, but till now they are own branchesof clients. if you have not tried it, you cannto say, the software is not descibed, it is just a normal gnutella client working over i2p. so remove the deletion mark. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.234.135.232 (talk • contribs)

• Comment: Although I do not quite follow what you are saying, I started this debate by saying that this software was non-notable. If a merge is innappropriate, then I can see no reason for this article to be kept, as there is no assertion of notability. J Milburn 19:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.