Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Not Sorry.net

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Phgao 06:34, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I'm Not Sorry.net

I'm Not Sorry.net (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

references are only self references, thus non notable website and should technically be A7 speedied Phgao 06:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

• Comment I found a link to The Nation's story that the article mentions: [1]. Looking for others. Ichormosquito 06:21, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Comment Style Weekly: [2] In These Times: [3] Ichormosquito 06:26, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, interview with site's founder in World (magazine): [4] If asked to pay, here it is Google cached:[5] Write up in Salon.com article: [6] Meets WP:WEB. Ichormosquito 06:27, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, notable per provided references. --Dhartung | Talk 07:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Notable and important web site for women like me. Bobsbasement 11:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep- meets criteria in WP:WEB Thunderwing 14:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Needs a bit expanding beyond it's immediate universe and tying into other articles surrounding the abortion issues would be helpful. Benjiboi 20:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

• I am still new to adding things but thank other users for helping me edit with sources and lobbying to keep the entry. This is a worthwhile site.MandalayVA 23:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. I believe that notability has been established per WP:WEB, as the site has been covered in magazines like Salon, World, and The Nation. It was also mentioned by the writer Judith Warner in an entry on her New York Times-hosted blog. I have attempted to improve the organization of the article by creating thematic sections and have also added more content. -Severa (!!!) 12:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.