Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypercluster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Robert 01:46, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hypercluster

Arxiv, google and the Harvard abstract service show no use of the term "hypercluster" in the astrophysics community. It is not a real term appearing in literature and thus does not require an article. -- Xerxes 04:29, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

The term does appear to have some use referring to computer clusters, but I can't find anything related to astronomy. Peyna 04:41, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

• weak delete. I agree in only finding reference to computing. Except for one article, but it is not clear whether here "Maybe scientists will find evidence for superclusters gravitationally bound in a hypercluster." it is being used as a term, or to create a neologism extending the concept of superclusters. If someone can provide evidence for use of the term, I will readily change my vote. jnothman ^talk 04:44, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as hyper-neologsim. It's a term that's hypothetically applicable to a hypothesized phenomona that hasn't actually been observed yet. FRS 20:41, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as the term "hypercluster" isn't really recognized by astrophysics. "Supercluster" is another matter. Jtmichcock 00:29, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as neologism, unverified. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 00:42, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.