Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydrox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 04:33, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hydrox

A consensus was reached at DRV to overturn the speedy deletion of this article [1]. This is a procedural nomination so I abstain. Thryduulf 15:42, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

• Strong keep as a highly well-known product. --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Very significant as the predecessor to Oreos. ike9898 15:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Significant, nationally-known product. —Chowbok 16:48, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, well-known product. NawlinWiki 17:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep known by most as an Oreo knockoff, but Hydrox actually came first. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:14, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - per above - AfDs are getting ridiculous! PT ^(s-s-s-s) 20:14, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep Andrew Lenahan is exactly right. Noroton 22:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. Meets the requirements for product notability. Original speedy was nonsense.Cynical 22:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Verifiable and meets notability requirements of WP:CORP#Criteria for products and services. --Satori Son 00:49, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, a childhood favorite and highly notable foodstuff. RFerreira 01:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.