Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydrogen party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. NSLE _(T+C) 01:00, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hydrogen party

370 Google, most have nothing to do with this band. delete

Lotsofissues 00:40, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Could arguably be speedied since it only very vaguely asserts notability. - Haukur 00:43, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete- YANNB Reyk 00:53, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn band DrIdiot 00:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Insufficient notability, looks like it could be a speedy delete. --Dakota ~ ε 01:17, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Agree on the speedy. --Aaron 03:28, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Band does not meet criteria on WP:MUSIC. 04:35, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I wasn't invited :( Sceptre ^(Talk) 14:05, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete even though they use a Theremin, one of my favourite instruments. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 14:06, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete no assertion of and no apparent notability. --kingboyk 16:11, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Izehar 18:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as per WP:MUSIC. Dustimagic 19:55, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• A7 Speedy. Band vanity. JHMM13 (T | C) 21:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. Blnguyen 02:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn-band, vanity. --Terence Ong ^Talk 11:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.