Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydroairy boat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Low participation, but the "lacks sources" argument is quite convincing. (My belief is that this is a company term for one of their products, as such it could perhaps be included with an article on the company if it's notable, but we have no such article.) Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:46, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hydroairy boat

Hydroairy boat (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I found this through an OTRS ticket; I needed to expand it a bit to resolve the complaint but could not find sources. In fact, I was not able to find any significant information about this from reliable sources on the web. In fact, I can't see any evidence that this has gone beyond prototype. Regrettably, I nominate for deletion. Guy (Help!) 19:36, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 20:55, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Per nom and the fact that this article is not telling us anything that hasn't been covered in Multihull. --Brad (talk) 03:57, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.