Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyaku Shiki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Non admin closure. ~ Wikihermit 22:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hyaku Shiki

Hyaku Shiki (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete. List of fictional weapons in Gundam universe. Information such as the fact that it has a "Minovsky type ultracompact fusion reactor, output rated at 2015 kW" belongs in another wiki, but not in wikipedia. No real-world content from reliable sources either. Oscarthecat 21:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Merge/Redirect to the appropriate series article. But really, I think you might want to try working with some people since this is but one of many many articles. There is a WP:GUNDAM you should try. FrozenPurpleCube 22:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC) FrozenPurpleCube 22:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete or Transwiki WP is not a guide for the show and this weapon is lacking significant coverage from independent sources Corpx 01:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep this is one of the more prominent mecha in the series. If there is a well-developed List article, merging would also be an option. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Polaron (talk • contribs) 01:05, August 25, 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Has major role in two series and also notable enough to appear in over 20 non-Sunrise's video games (though only 19 can be cited now). L-Zwei 05:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Deletion is not an alternative to cleanup, and the need for cleanup is not grounds for deletion. Kyaa the Catlord 05:52, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Same reason as Kyaa, and anything to do with Char Aznable is notable enough to be kept. Cleanup and an image or two would be good.--Dante 00:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Anything to do with a work of fiction is not inherently notable. Notability must be provided by significant coverage through reliable sources Corpx 07:19, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.