Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hutton, Cumbria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sr13 03:09, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hutton, Cumbria

Not notable villiage. --DimaG 22:25, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Note: this nomination was not completed properly. It is now. --Dhartung | Talk 23:19, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

• Move to Hutton John, Cumbria, which seems to be an actual place (and actual places are generally notable). Every map I use gives that as the place name, not Hutton (note that it's 8 mi west of Penrith, not east). Also note that Hutton Roof and Hutton-in-Forest are also near Penrith but several miles north of this place. --Dhartung | Talk 23:21, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep There's no such thing as a 'not notable villiage' on Wikipedia as policy and precedent holds that such places are notable by definition. Perhaps it needs to be renamed, perhaps not, but the body of the article itself should be retained. Nick mallory 03:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep all real places are notable. Rename if necessary. Resolute 05:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, as localities such as villages are inherently notable providing they can be reliably sourced. RFerreira 06:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.