Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hummer Card
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. — ceejayoz talk 23:14, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Hummer Card
NN, D. ComCat 00:26, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep real magic trick. As usual, deletionists are morons. ♥♥purplefeltangel♥♥ 01:56, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Hey, Rocky! Watch me pull this Keep out of my hat! As notable as all the other magic tricks we have articles on. Incidentally, I think that explaining magic tricks behind a spoiler warning is a fantastic thing for an encyclopedia to do. — mendel ☎ 02:36, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep per mendel. StarryEyes 03:56, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep real magic trick as Ms. Purplefeltangel pointed out, but I think it should be expanded, maybe include notable magicians who perform the trick, maybe find out what creative mind came up with the trick etc, etc.KnowledgeOfSelf 05:36, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep sounds good to me and per above reasons.---Newyorktimescrossword 05:46, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, notability established. Could use an appropriate category. Christopher Parham (talk) 06:19, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- keep please it is a real and verifiable magic trick and the article has improved alot Yuckfoo 06:23, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, article has basics about real magic effect. It should be expanded though. Perhaps drop it off at Wikipedia:WikiProject Magic? - Mgm|(talk) 11:10, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, there are in excess of 3 million hits on Google. ComCat, do you do any research before trying to get something removed? --BenM 13:22, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, and please, let's have some guidelines about AFD Spamming. Trollderella 16:01, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep as WP:V and I refer some people back to WP:CIVIL.--Isotope23 16:38, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep: verifiable and somewhat notable. --TantalumTelluride 21:12, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. And I rewrote it just now to make it more encyclopedic. Janet13 21:18, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep as rewritten. Nice save. MCB 22:06, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.