Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humanure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. howcheng {chat} 17:50, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Humanure

Delete as a neologism - it even says so right in the article! Vanigo 21:36, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

• Strong Keep and expand. Gets 67,000 Google hits. [1] A notable concept in human waste recycling/composting. Blackcats 21:42, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, this is a well-known term. There is no rule which prohibits neologisms from Wikipedia. They just need to be properly cited. Rhobite 21:56, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect. To get the real poop check the composting toilet article. Durova 23:47, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. The concept of humanure and humanure composting is interesting and distinct from composting toilets in some notable ways. jsheffield
• Weak delete, seems a bit jokey. Stifle 01:16, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge, although new this is a valid concept and an elegant description. 12:27, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.