Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humanistic medicine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Article rewritten; nominaiton no longer applicable. mikka (t) 01:11, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Humanistic medicine

• del original research, by the confession in the text. mikka (t) 06:58, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
  • keep after major rewriting.mikka (t) 01:11, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - how on earth is it original research? And since when is a project by undergraduates employed and supervised by a doctor considered to be unreliable? This is a common term in very widespread use, and their definition of it is correct. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 08:30, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Please don't confuse the topic and the article. mikka (t) 01:11, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - an important aspect of the teaching of medicine. —Brim 09:33, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, but mark as a stub because I feel this needs more expansion (of course, it's already on cleanup, but...). It perhaps should also be linked as a see also from bedside manner, to which it seems to be related. --FreelanceWizard 10:36, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep for a worthy and emerging topic. I'm revising it to make it more encyclopedic. Bmdavll ^talk 22:56, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

I apologize for the nomination. I didn't pay attention to the date of creation. The article didn't have time to mature. mikka (t) 01:11, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.