Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human Rights Abuses in Kashmir

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Human Rights Abuses in Kashmir

Human Rights Abuses in Kashmir (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete. Blatant PoV fork. Consists mostly of a bunch of long quotes, with some lovely personal commentary thrown in for good measure. The recently-registered user (User:Khanra (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)) who created this article seems to have an agenda on his mind, looking at his contrib trail. He has removed content and added PoV remarks in almost all his edits. Nominated for deletion per WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:POVFORK, WP:SOAP and WP:WWIN in general. Thanks, Max - You were saying? 08:33, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete It's just a propaganda screed. Nick mallory 08:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Clear-cut propaganda. If the user is on Wikipedia solely with an agenda of propaganda, then s/he ought to be warned and perhaps admin action is needed. --Hnsampat 12:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - the horrible style and huge quotes are enough for me. GoldengloveContribs ·Talk 12:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep and move to a more NPOV title. If the nominator is claiming that it is a PoV fork, it would be well to add what it was forked from. I have not found a Human rights in Kashmir article. This definitely requires heavy editing to make it NPOV and appropriate in style, but the subject would appear to have potential, and this text is not wholly useless to someone who may wish to improve it. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete If someone wants to create an article Human rights in Kashmir that would be fine but this article too much propaganda and should be deleted. Davewild 16:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Blatant POV fork. --vi5in[talk] 18:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.