Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human-animal hybrid
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Redirect to Parahuman. Deathphoenix ʕ 14:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Human-animal hybrid
- Delete - Wikipedia should not be a place to list your favorite or least favorite quotes. This page is worthless to the Wikipedia community. I believe that all useful information should be moved to Bushism and Parahumans. Then the page should redirect to Parahumans. Dakart 02:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- What you're basically asking for then is a merge and redirect. That does not require a deletion at any stage, and this should have never come to AfD. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 04:02, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - there is such a thing as an animal-human hybrid. Specifically, if one were to include the nuclear DNA of a human but the mitochondria of a pig ovum, then you'd have a plausible creature (and one that is probably technically possible today). This is to what GW Bush was referring, even though he probably doesn't realise it. - Richardcavell 02:40, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- As it looks now, I vote to delete as a neologism, as the article itself doesn't even explain what the word refers to (other than to point us to Chimera and Parahuman). -- Grev 03:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and merge per Dakart, please. Article is about a Bushism. As such, it is as about as complete as possible. Needs to be w/ other Bushism, w/ "see also" to Chimera and Parahuman). :) Dlohcierekim 03:09, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Merge to parahuman or Bushism. It's a nice little article (or would be once you take out the commentary about Bush's religion) that references a political discussion that has attracted notice of the President and references National Geographic. Also probably lose the picture, whatever it is. Anyway, "Delete and merge" is an odd vote- illegal under the GFDL unless you want some history merge- and I think it would be worth a redirect. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 03:56, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to Parahuman, which already has all relevant info there. If our readers want to learn more about Bushisms, we can just put a small link to that article in the Parahuman article's sentence on the Bush quote.--Pharos 06:24, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect. This shouldn't really have come here. Vizjim 09:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect. It has sources, but these aren't relevant to the topic of the article (George W. Bush), and the topic Parahuman already mentions and expands on. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 12:13, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect per Pharos and others. Paddles 13:43, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect seems to work. Just zis Guy you know? 15:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect – keep and redirect to Parahuman as suggested above – Gurch 21:32, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Merge to parahuman and Bushism. - CNichols 23:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete POV, with no useful information. Most likely, though, it's because I have a POV very different from the author's. M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 23:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Merge to List of most egregious abuses of medical research. Ewlyahoocom 21:07, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete iff We will kill them in the shithouse is deleted. Grue 13:58, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- Merge to parahuman and Bushism. Joffeloff 16:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - What an amazingly useless Wikipedia article. Not only does this add nothing at all to Wikipedia, there's already an article for it here Parahumans. It seems the only reason this article exists is to sell the T-Shirt so eloquently displayed on the Wiki article's page. (Kujila)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.