Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hulen

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. The votes were 5 delete, 2 keep. dbenbenn | talk 18:48, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hulen

Non-notable stub, basically just an advert JeremyA 04:13, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• If it's indeed the oldest rock 'n roll bar, it may be notable. Then again I'm not sure what is meant by the term "rock 'n roll" bar. Radiant! 08:26, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• I formatted it. Agreed with Radiant!, if it's the oldest "rock 'n roll" bar it's notable. Could we have a Norwegian's view? Mgm|^(talk) 09:03, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Easy to find lots of mentions for this place, but only one I can see mentions "oldest...etc." Anyway, it is pretty subjective/arguable -- what was a rock 'n roll bar 30 years ago.....40 years ago....50 years ago? HowardB 09:20, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, this is helpful. Wyss 21:13, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable, and I agree with HowardB. JoaoRicardo 02:58, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep. I'd like to see information the "oldest rock 'n roll bar" claim expanded. In its current state it's barely notable enough for inclusion. Carrp | Talk 18:06, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, just under the bar of notability for me. Megan1967 06:17, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, and add a rule of thumb that all bars in operation for 35+ years are worthy of entry. Too bad the article lacks any color, it should be expanded by someone who knows Hulen's history.
• Delete, subjective notability. JamesBurns 08:06, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.