Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hubbertism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Nufy8 22:37, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hubbertism

This word is a neologism that is not meritous of having an article. The creator of this article did so as an attempt to push POV at Hubbert peak theory. This is a violation of WP:POINT and WP:NPOV. Johntex 19:47, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. Silliness. The {{religion-stub}} is a bit much. -- BD2412 talk 20:08, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Quasipalm 20:18, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete or Transwiki to Wiktionary; if it has some common usage (which I doubt)DV8 2XL 20:33, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
    • That's often an admirable suggestion, but do bear in mind that other Wikis are not AfD's dumping ground. If you were working on Wiktionary, would you aquiesce to keep this? -Splash 23:43, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete trolling. Gazpacho 21:05, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete silliness, bordering on joke article Wikipedia:Vandalism. I wouldn't object to a speedy. -Splash 23:43, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete of course, and can I get some help reigning this guy in? He is currently making a mess of Hubbert peak theory. A quick perusal of the talk page will make the problem obvious. - Taxman Talk 18:54, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment I didn't invent the term - i found it. But any help reigning in the (other) article is welcome - it looks like we have consensus to rename it and weed out some of the hyperbole and thinly supported pseudoscience. Benjamin Gatti
  • Delete - Bad faith, neologism created in violation of WP:POINT. Dalf | Talk 06:59, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete peak neologism. Klonimus 02:42, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Trolling. William M. Connolley 16:48:22, 2005-09-06 (UTC).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.