Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howie Klein

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WjBscribe 22:29, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Howie Klein

Howie Klein (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Ambiguous Notability Mmckee 17:58, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep Howie Klein should not be deleted. He has some Notablility. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.182.238.17 (talk) 06:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • I dunno, the guy seems pretty notable to me. The article has some decent references as well. I'd say keep it. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 18:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep President of Warner Bros. records for more than 10 years seems sufficient evidence of notability to me. Accounting4Taste 19:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and cleanup, he's notable as per Accounting4Taste (t c). --Darkwind (talk) 21:59, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. As noted above...he was the President of WB Records for 12 years, which means there is probably an infinite amount of news coverage about the guy. Smashville 22:46, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, THE Howie Klein?! In good faith, though, this is an article that makes a notable person seem insignificant. --Dhartung | Talk 23:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep but rewrite. He's notable for being President of the first American new wave/punk record label 415 Records, AND for being President of Reprise. The article just needs to be better written, researched, and sourced. DanielLevitin 06:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep President of Warner Brothers Records for 12 years seems pretty notable, the article is sourced, I don't see a problem. --Wingsandsword 17:32, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Unless I'm mistaken, he wasn't head of Warner Records per se, just of Reprise, a Warner-owned label. But Reprise is a highly notable label regardless. --Dhartung | Talk 07:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.