Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Beckman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:45, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Howard Beckman

Howard Beckman (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Its hard to see why this person should have an entry in Wikipedia. No links to sources and whatever there is seems to be published by him, MBest-son (talk) 22:34, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

• Keep. There is no requirement that references be available online. Nonetheless, I added two newspaper articles which are available online and which appeared in the New York Daily News and the Albuquerque Journal. --Eastmain (talk) 00:17, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep he's also referenced/cited in another book in addition to the sources linked in the article and that Eastmain found. It needs a re-write but he appears notable and that there's info to source a cleanup from TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 05:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. A well sourced article on a notable subject. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. Every word of this article is 3rd party published referenced quotes. I stripped it down to bare bones, but I was deleting 3rd party published quotes in order to strip it down. That's a pity. I thought 3rd party published quotes was Wiki's requirement. Notable subject.--Rickbrown9 (talk) 19:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - Multiple reliable sources provided.Bakaman 02:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.