Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to look after rabbits

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] How to look after rabbits

The article How to look after rabbits is original research, anonymously submitted without sources, and likely a primary-school essay. Additionally, the subject is already adequately covered in a subsection in the rabbit article. This article should be deleted. -- Cleduc 22:34, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete -- Infrogmation 22:39, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Gazpacho 22:47, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • I agree - this is already covered in the main article, so we don't need this as a separate one. Thanks to the original contributor, though. (yes, delete) DS 23:50, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, article duplication, original research. Megan1967 02:19, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge with rabbit, of course. (There's little, if anything, to merge, though.) This isn't original research. This is pretty basic stuff that pretty much every rabbit owner, and indeed pretty much every household pet owner, learns. "Make sure your rabbit likes it's food or other wise it won't eat it and it will starve." That's "original research" by your standards? Really? Uncle G 04:31, 2005 Jan 16 (UTC)
    • "Original research" is as close as I could come to describing what this article is for purposes of VFD. Yes, really. -- Cleduc 20:24, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not original research, but not encyclopedic either. Wikipedia isn't a repository for how-tos and instructions. Transwiki to WikiBooks is probably in order. Gwalla | Talk 05:01, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • There is already a Wikibook on dog care, so this could be transwikied there. I'm not sure it would be useful, since it's so crappy, so weak delete. Tuf-Kat 08:57, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Seems common sense based, Delete. - Greaser 02:04, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Ah, bless! I can just imagine an eight-year-old girl diligently typing this after receiving her beloved pet at Christmas. Axl 12:41, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)