Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to Kill a Mockingbird

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE — Gwalla | Talk 01:44, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] How to Kill a Mockingbird

Non-notable internet fad with not all that many google links. Possibly vanity. --Tothebarricades July 7, 2005 05:40 (UTC)

• Delete nn flash, wiki is not a web directory, etc. Friday 7 July 2005 05:56 (UTC)
• Delete non notable self promotion. JamesBurns 7 July 2005 07:52 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Why do we delete this article, yet keep other internet fads like All your base are belong to us? -Ichabod 7 July 2005 08:39 (UTC)
  • All your base are belong to us is extremely notable. This isn't. Cyclone49 7 July 2005 09:43 (UTC)
  • Yes, that's like saying get rid of Star Wars because we got rid of some amateur film that 300 people have seen. Poor analogy. --Tothebarricades July 8, 2005 07:49 (UTC)
• Delete wiki is not a web directory nor vehicle for self promotion Moriori July 7, 2005 08:46 (UTC)
• Delete per Moriori. Dcarrano July 7, 2005 16:46 (UTC)
• Delete: NN, vanity? —ArmadniGeneral 7 July 2005 17:05 (UTC)
• Delete, though I must note that, unlike most crap, the article is pretty well-Wikified. -Thepinterpause 7 July 2005 17:56 (UTC)
• Delete, redirect to the famous novel To Kill a Mockingbird. Radiant_>|< July 8, 2005 12:42 (UTC)
• Delete I also second Moriori. Some internet fads are trend-setting anthropologically interesting; this one is purely stupid. The article contains nothing that isn't in the cartoon itself. July 9, 2005 22:15 (UTC)
• Keep Well, I thought it was pretty funny, so I'd like it to stay in. EvilPhoenix talk 22:05, July 13, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep This is a part of American culture. A small part, but still a part. Removing this is treason. DoomPenguin 22:13, July 13, 2005 (UTC) vote is actually by 66.82.9.54 (talk · contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.