Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hostilix

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 17:47, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hostilix

I have serious concerns about the notability of this distribution. - Ta bu shi da yu 06:31, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. As it is, it's advertising. DoubleBlue (Talk) 06:40, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
• It detects file type and before lunch it, emulates Dos/Windows -- yeah? I do that before breakfast. Delete. Ben-w 08:42, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. There is no instance in which an encyclopedia article should use a first person plural pronoun outside of a citation. -- B. Ramerth (talk) 08:54, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: I don't want any distribution to lunch my file types. I may need them later. Wikipedia is not Freshmeat. Geogre 13:13, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. How is this encyclopaedic? Lack of NPOV, product plug, personal opinion of the author? I think not. --Lejend 13:30, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.