Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HorrorScope (webzine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep --Haemo 22:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] HorrorScope (webzine)

HorrorScope (webzine) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

HorrorScope (webzine) is one of seven articles (now listed at AfD) created by a new user. These articles seem designed to advance the publisher, Brimstone Press. I have listed them separately so that they may be considered separately. HorrorScope (webzine) has not received enough coverage in reliable sources that are independent of HorrorScope (webzine) and Brimstone Press to develop an attributable article on the topic and the article should be deleted. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 01:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete due to lack of independent coverage. Capitalistroadster 03:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 03:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep or Merge. I created this and the other entries mentioned in the AfD banner. For a full explanation, see my note on Shane Jiraiya Cummings AfD talk page and my talk page. Re: this entry, I believe this is a notable webzine that has won a major Australian literary award. I'd propose if editors feel this entry is not notable enough on its own, then perhaps it could be merged with Brimstone Press? --Outcast44 05:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as fails notability requirements of WP:WEB --Gavin Collins 09:56, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

  Reply I disagree. This webzine has won two well known Australian literary awards and has been nominated for several more - easily satisfying criteria 2 of WP:WEB. Again, I suggest either Keeping this or Merging the entry with Brimstone Press. Outcast44 14:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Keep I'd like to see more independent references, but it barely squeaks by with the ones it currently has in my interpretation of notability. Turlo Lomon 10:08, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep or possibly Merge with Brimstone Press. It has won two awards that so seem to satisfy WP:WEB criteria 2. --Craw-daddy | T | 22:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.