Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hornivore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.--Húsönd 03:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hornivore

Hornivore (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

A silly and nonnotable neologistic dicdef, according to the talk page apparently from a "personality test" ([1]) - hardly a reliable source. Contested speedy deletion candidate, unfortunately fits no CSD. Sandstein 21:07, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: This AfD nomination edit-conflicted with someone's attempt to redirect this to Womanizer. Whatever... I still feel deletion is the better option here. With 830 Google hits, it's not that likely a search term. Sandstein 21:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Womanizer makes a bit more sense, this is just too nn. SkierRMH 00:18, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete don't redirect. We should be giving due weight to this term. And that due weight is zero. Pascal.Tesson 00:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete exactly per Pascal.Tesson. — coelacan talk — 03:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Richard 10:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Pascal.Tesson. WMMartin 18:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.