Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hormensis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy redirect to hormesis per Choess. (I double-checked, and he's right.) Non-admin closure based on WP:IAR. YechielMan 05:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hormensis
I may be wrong, but the google results would suggest that (if this is even the correct definition of the word) that it is not a widely used phrase. In any case, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. J Milburn 18:40, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete or transwiki to Wiktionary per WP:WINAD. Currently nothing more than a dicdef. Walton monarchist89 19:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Quarl (talk) 07:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as a neologism. Do not transwiki. A redirect might be possible. YechielMan 19:26, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to hormesis, the correct term. Choess 03:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
