Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 19:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Horance

Horance (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Nominating as a primary author of the article. This is one of those "Years ago I was dumb and young and made an article about an insignificant topic" dealies. Why, you may ask, did I make it? Heck, the answer is simple: I think Horance kicks Sephy's butt. =) Yes, it could be argued that here we have a game character who appeared in two games in a major computer game series, so that would be keep-worthy, but basically, this article boils down to a plot summary that's more about the game plot than the character background and how it relates to the game, and if you really think of the character, he's not a major character at all, but clear merge material if even that. Basically, we now have an Ultima wikia article, and the Ultima wikia is probably a better place for "kind of important" characters (as opposed to "very important" characters, of which we do have justifiable articles). I assure you we will lose little if this article is deleted as is, and I'm going to eventually write a better plot summary for Ultima VII article. wwwwolf (barks/growls) 14:12, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per author. You have matured in the myriad ways of Wikipedia, my son. Your past shall be forgiven, and shall trouble you no longer. Go and sin no more. :-) Realkyhick 17:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom: if you wish you can {{db-author}} it since the only other edits are minor copy, style, category, and vandalism. Eleland 19:45, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
  • ...or just go delete it myself, but I'm in no hurry and I'd rather do this by the book, so to speak, just to see if anyone has any pressing needs to preserve the content. So let's keep this open for at least a few days, shall we? The article has been sitting there for quite a while now, it's not like a few more days will make things much worse =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 21:34, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 22:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.