Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hope and Tess Cruickshank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 18:35, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hope and Tess Cruickshank

Contested PROD. Reasoning was that their only claim to notability was infant/toddler acting roles in 2000–01, and haven't been heard from since. I agree original PRODder and say Delete. Angr (talk • contribs) 16:43, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, nowhere near notable. The only claim to notable is not a valid one, IMO. --soUmyaSch 16:51, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. IrishGuy 17:25, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Kicking222 17:32, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Babies = props, not actors. (Full discolsure: I Prod'ed it.) Fan1967 17:34, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I don't consider babies to be actors either. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:31, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- ReyBrujo 03:24, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.