Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hootanany
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted by User:Elkman per G3. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 18:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC). Also, good suggestion for a redirect, (just noticed it), as a very plausible misspelling. Now redirects to Hootenanny, which is a valid disambiguation page. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hootanany
I think this is a hoax. No references are supplied, and I can find no confirmation. The "hwabong" in the illustration is actually a hookah or hubble-bubble and the same picture can be seen in the article Hookah. JohnCD (talk) 17:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Delete Article is a hoax or joke take your pick. "Conformadox Judaism"? Yeah my Spidey sense is tingling there. Wildthing61476 (talk) 17:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G3 (I've now tagged the article). While I initially thought the article was a misspelling of Hootenanny, looking at the article it's an obvious hoax. "Conformadox Judaism"? --Pixelface (talk) 18:08, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Would a redirect to Hootenanny work as a plausible typo? Wildthing61476 (talk) 18:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Kill itDelete Sorry, got a little type happy there. Most likley a hoax. Hit that little delete button over there. Dustitalk to me 18:38, 11 April 2008 (UTC)- Comment Please note that the creator of the article has no other contributions to Wikipedeia other than the creation of this article. Dustitalk to me 18:40, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Actually, it is real, and I was about to provide sources but I am in school and therefore cannot at this time, however I will as soon as I get out.
- Delete as above. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 18:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.