Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holy Tantra Jin-Gang-Dhyana Buddhism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox • T [20:59, 10 April 2006]

[edit] Holy Tantra Jin-Gang-Dhyana Buddhism

As far as I can tell, this page is promotion for a marginal esoteric Buddhist group. A lot of the information on this page is accurate, but not specific to this group; rather, it is describing Chinese tantric Buddhism in general. A google search for "Holy Tantra Jin-Gang-Dhyana Buddhism" turns up a couple official sites followed immediately by the Wikipedia article. This modern group might be an interesting subject for an article, but, unfortunately, the article as it exists gives us no context about them. Nat Krause^(Talk!) 00:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 00:14, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Mak (talk) 05:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 05:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Per nom. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 09:57, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:16, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. No vote from me, but just a couple things to consider. A google search for "中國漢傳密宗". Which is shown as the chinese name for the subject of the article yield considerably more results. However, I could be searching "cute kittens" for all I know. Also, does notability in the chinese speaking world make it notable in the english speaking world? Just some thoughts. Tombride 16:24, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Good point. "中國漢傳密宗" translates literally as "Chinese Han tradition (or transmission) esoteric (or secret) sect". It would be a bit labour-intensive for me to take a close look at the google results, but it's worth noting that the top hit is a userpage on the Chinese Wikipedia, followed by two official pages of this group. - Nat Krause^(Talk!) 17:31, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
  • In that case delete. Notability doesn't seem to exist here. Tombride 05:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, grudgingly, as per Nat's analysis. --He:ah? 19:36, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.