Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollywood brought down John Kerry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Deleted by Neutrality (Per VfD). Master Thief Garrett^Talk 07:33, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hollywood brought down John Kerry

This article appears to be somebody's personal commentary - even if it were to be rewritten, I can't see any hope of it becoming a properly encyclopedic article. -- ChrisO 07:46, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Inherently POV. --EvilZak 07:47, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete This is an editorial, original research, pov, not an encyclopedia article and with no potential of becoming one. --Zantastik 07:49, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete speculation doesn't seem like the stuff encyclopedias are made of--nixie 07:50, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This isn't Freep-o-pedia. sɪzlæk [ +t, +c ] 09:23, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete POV essay, very likely copyvio since it incorporates two people's articles verbatim. Author: This is what external links are for. Gazpacho 09:38, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Obvious political POV essay. Nestea 11:17, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. POV. Ben please vote! 12:21, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Obviously someone seems to misunderstand what the concept of encyclopedias are about. --Mitsukai 13:44, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Zantastik stated it best. --Unfocused 13:59, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Impossible to make this NPOV as it currently stands. Agreed possible copyvio. 23skidoo 14:06, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete this bullshit Stancel 14:40, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - NPOV, original research, unencyclopeadic. --capnez 16:25, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - inherently essayist title, non-POV summation of the info can take up a line or 2 in the Kerry article. -- BD2412 ^thimkact 22:14, 2005 May 16 (UTC)
• Comment The user that created this article should be blocked. Stancel 22:42, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - badly written politically biased rant. Rogertudor 22:47, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.