Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollywood Halts It's Bottomless Pitfall

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 15:11, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hollywood Halts It's Bottomless Pitfall

This really ought to be shot on sight - it's a sports report! --Doc (?) 01:00, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. There needs to be a CSD for unusable article name. Oh, and the content is unusable too. How about two strikes and you're out? Friday (talk) 01:03, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

No there shouldn't. Sometimes we get perfectly valid articles under bad titles. They need moving rather than speedying. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:09, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Yeesh. Looks like a cut-and-paste from a high school newspaper. 23skidoo 01:16, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. But hey, if we're going after simple sports result reports, I've got about 200 cricket result articles (Sidcup v Bournemouth type stuff, not international test matches) I'd like to shoot. (No, I'm not kidding.) -- MCB 01:58, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Doc and Friday, and tell author that "its" and "it's" are not the same thing. --Metropolitan90 04:34, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• delete Pete.Hurd 05:41, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, granular news report. If it needs to be included at all, but it in the article on the teams. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:09, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 13:33, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a sports newspaper. — JIP | Talk 16:59, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not only completetely irrelevant, but also non-notable and not very well written. The deletion policy has no time for stuff like this. Batmanand 19:35, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.