Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly Owens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:24, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Holly Owens

Vanity CunningLinguist 01:35, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. Not vanity since Holly apparently did not write this, but still unencyclopedic junk. Very funny though. Academic Challenger 01:37, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • I dont beleive pages have to be written by the person to be considered vanity -CunningLinguist 01:40, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • BJAODN. -- BD2412 talk 01:43, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
  • BJAODN. --Sn0wflake 01:51, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fancruft. Physchim62 02:48, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Some bored idiot having a little fun. RabidMonkeysEatGrass 04:37, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - but a good BJAODN :) "'child-bearing' hips"" ha. Jasonglchu 14:44, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Sweet of the guy, but vanity and therefore not for Wikipedia. Suntiger 18:00, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • *sigh* People in love should not be allowed to edit articles. Soundguy99 18:15, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete pointless cuteness. — Chameleon 20:09, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Hey I wrote the article and I know it isn't very educational I just did it for fun and I was bored although I don't consider myslef an idiot that is probably debatable. Although I am sure if I had the time/effort I could make some sort of case wh everyone should know about Holly.
    • Wikipedia isn't for making a case. Go and edit something else.  :) — Chameleon 20:09, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • While fun, Wikipedia is not just for fun. It doesn't belong in an encyclopaedia, it doesn't belong here. jglc | t | c 20:17, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • The creator again just saying I knew it would be deleted (thought it would last longer then a day though) so if you must go ahead I have no real objections and I know that although in my encyclopedia Holly Owens would have a section that if it were placed in this one then everyone would want a page.
    • Kind sir, your dedication is admirable. jglc | t | c 15:06, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Vanity by the girl's lover. Delete - I am sorry. - Mike Rosoft 15:31, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - someone has to put it! Smileyrepublic 22:46, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete it already the page I made (I am the original creator) no longer amuses me and I am sorry for wasting some peoples time with the whole page. I promise any further articles I add/edit on Wikipedia will have actual educational value.
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.