Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holland & Hart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 23:02, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Holland & Hart

NN as per WP:CORP: Librarianofages 02:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, only 253 unique Ghits. [1] Kimchi.sg 04:22, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - I think it is important enough. - Richardcavell 04:44, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • comment but notable enough under WP:CORP

Criteria for companies and corporations A company or corporation is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria:

The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself. This criterion excludes: Media re-prints of press releases, other publications where the company or corporation talks about itself, and advertising for the company. 1 Trivial coverage, such as newspaper articles that simply report extended shopping hours or the publications of telephone numbers and addresses in business directories. This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations. 2 The company or corporation is listed on ranking indexes, produced by well-known and independent publications, of important companies. 3 4 The company's or corporation's share price is used to calculate stock market indices 5 6. Being used to calculate an index that simply comprises the entire market is excluded. ?

• Comment: there is a link to WP:CORP (no need to copy conditions, we can read these conditions on original page). But, do I need to investigate notability? If the company meets WP:CORP as you claim (which criteria), prove this with certain external sources. I suppose you checked all these criteria, do you? --MaNeMeBasat 07:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Keep. "Largest law firm in ROcky Mountains" reasonable claim of notability, 180,000+ Google hits; Google News shows firm mentioned an average of once a day in news media (most recent two weeks). Monicasdude 22:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Monicasdude. JoshuaZ 03:18, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.