Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holistic law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:19, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Holistic law

Non-notable topic, part of a series of vanity/advert articles posted by this user to promote his book & law practice. Klaw ¡digame! 17:41, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete advertising. IMO, a neologistic claim of morality for an inherently amoral profession. --Fire Star 21:09, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for all the above reasons plus those I have stated at User_talk:Bapu. --Coolcaesar 06:31, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete this and other spam from Bapu as well. Pavel Vozenilek 08:39, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Stifle 02:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete no credible sources on which an article could be written redstucco 09:29, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep since we have holistic everything else, why not law? I see no reason why this is considered to be invalid. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 14:15, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.