Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hofflenosh

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 21:43, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hofflenosh

neologism — J3ff 06:50, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Neologism Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:18, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, yep. Wyss 19:28, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Mikkalai 07:12, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• keep - how the heck are we meant to get this in the OED with you lot deleting it?!? I reckon, apart from my vote, this set of votes is going to be hofflenosh ;) We are serious about this, and you are the first site to openly oppose our plans for hofflenosh. Everyone else has accepted it and liked it with a "lol" or two, but once again Wikipedia proves itself to be humourless, with no consideration for anyone else except its own users.

Note: Above vote was made by 213.162.102.59 Unsigned/unregistered votes do not count. Please register with Wikipedia and have at least some edits before voting on VfD. =) --Andylkl 07:25, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)

• keep - Though the intonation of the word itself is a bit daft, it's a genuine phenomenon that deserves a specific definition and a word to go with it.

Note: Above vote was made by 172.214.242.7 See above. --Andylkl 07:25, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)

• keep - We all come across discussions like this, for example most political ones or 'evolution vs creationism' so I think that a word is needed to decribe this.

Note: Above vote was made by 84.67.1.255 See above. --Andylkl 07:25, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Neologism. Btw, it's not that Wikipedia is humourless, check out the BJAODN page for Wikipedian humour. ;) --Andylkl 07:25, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.