Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hock (zoology)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 12:53, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hock (zoology)

Dicdef. Already transwikied to Wiktionary. --Allen3 ^talk 20:48, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep or merge with something about horses. Kappa 21:18, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Kappa's extreme inclusionism is showing. RickK 00:05, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Capped Hock as a stub, unless there is some page I don't know about for equine maladies. Kyle543 00:30, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I'm certainly far from an extreme inclusionist, but I see no reason why this article couldn't grow as big as Head (anatomy) or possibly even Foot. --Angr/_comhrá 06:32, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• As an extreme mergist, I'm agreeing with merge with something about horses. Angr may well have a point, and if/when the article gets expanded enough it can always be broken out. Radiant_* 09:12, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Perfectly good veterinary anatomy stub --Tony Sidaway|Talk 19:45, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - By using the same logic, a majority of wikipedia shouldn't be here. Roodog2k 19:47, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.