Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hmc international

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:04, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hmc international

Non-notable, possible advertisement, possible fraud. All searches on "HMC international" lead to other companies. Searches on "HMC International" suit leads to pages about how a company of the same name was sued and closed for investment fraud. This article's company also provides several investment and financial services. Finally, the author's own user page is a link to this article, denoting some sort of personal purpose publicity. I suggest that until someone proves this organization's notability and credibility, that the article be deleted. Beltz 21:32, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Delete - No citations, bordering on advertising.--Nick Y. 00:09, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

The Company has a web-page under www.hmc-international.de and the firm was never sued and closed for investment fraud. The article is an overview of the company no commercial activities are involved here, proved because even no web-link was summited.

• Delete still non notable... It needs to cite references that prove it's notability. Beltz 17:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Beltz. Stifle (talk) 20:34, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete just like the properly capitalized Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HMC International (Closed; verdict = delete). -- Scientizzle 15:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

It's not correct to delete the article HMC International. The company does excist and the article is a overview about their activities. If this article will be deleted hundereds of other should be deleted as well, for example pwc (pricewaterhouse)!!! If someone wants to delete this article it should be stated clearly which part of the article should be changed because all policies and guidline have been fullfilled.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.