Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hit & Run

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merged and redirected The Evil Spartan 22:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hit & Run

Hit & Run (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not notable enough to have an independent article, although it is a very interesting and though-provoking blog, suggest merge to Reason (magazine). Wooyi^{Talk to me?} 01:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable. If you wanted to merge in the first place, see WP:MERGE.--trey 01:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Merge a less chatty summary of the material to Reason (magazine). Winning one award isn't real notability and there isn't much that's been written about it that I can find. --Dhartung | Talk 09:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 14:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan 17:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

• Merge into Reason (magazine), then redirect to Hit and run. Resolute 03:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note - I was about to close this AFD as merge, but I noticed that the page never had an AFD notice on it. As such, I am letting it go for a few more days to give the creator a chance to respond. The Evil Spartan 13:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect' to Hit and run 132.205.44.5 22:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.