Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of banking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Rx StrangeLove 17:53, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] History of banking

It seems a bit opinionated and possibly original research... UniReb 12:25, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

  • Agreed. However a decent article on this topic would certainly be welcome. Cleanup. - Demogorgon's Soup-taster 12:32, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
  • I'd say we keep it, put it into Wikification list and see what comes out - User:Cyberodin
  • Keep It needs a lot of work, but there is no reason to delete it. Sonic Mew | talk to me 13:34, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep as per User:Cyberodin. Dlyons493 14:15, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and Cleanup. As it stands it's not very good, but there's potentially a very useful article here. -- Arwel 14:18, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
  • keep and cleanup potentially facinating subject. Sabine's Sunbird 01:32, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep cleanup and expand. Article doesn't go beyond ancient history. Given the scope of the topic, perhaps it should be nominated as Collaboration of the week. Capitalistroadster 02:21, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. NSR (talk) 11:37, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. --Hurricane111 01:35, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Important subject; article will undoubtedly be improved over time. -- DS1953 02:57, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. I have a doctorate in banking. There is nothing in this article that is erroneous, but does lack referencing. It serves as a good introduction to the topic which needs to be added to, but should be kept. I suspect the author either got bored and has paused, having better things to do, or died in the middle of his typing.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.

.