This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 21:03, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
This is not an article. A intro paragraph which gets too much honor, if called original research. And one of the mostincoherent lists I've seen here. --Pjacobi July 6, 2005 19:28 (UTC)
Clean-up or delete and start again. It really is a mess. DoubleBlue (Talk) 6 July 2005 19:56 (UTC)
Delete, classification criteria are unclear, and adds nothing that can't be covered in Mythology or Pseudohistory. Dcarrano July 6, 2005 20:16 (UTC)
Delete Willbecome NPOV very quickly if there are no criteria.--Porturology 7 July 2005 03:04 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.