Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historical Association
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Withdrawn/Keep Marskell 10:15, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Historical Association
An odd one. The name and the text are generic enough I can't prove it exists. The Royal Historical Society and the American Historical Association both have articles and this refers to neither (its cat'ed as a British Organization). Delete unless someone can prove what it is. Marskell 18:50, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
Delete. No context.Pburka 19:06, 1 October 2005 (UTC)- Vote withdrawn based on new information. Pburka 00:24, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep It appears to be a real association, in Britain, with a focus on secondary education and local history. Historical Association Website Joaquin Murietta 19:21, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- In that case, it's a copyvio of the above website. Pburka 19:34, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Not clear on Wiki rules, but did the website have a copyright? or is is public domain? Joaquin Murietta 20:30, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Every website is specifically copyright protected unless they explicitly release the information to public domain and/or GFDL. With no copyright claim, copyright is assumed. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:22, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you for explaining this. Do you think we should rewrite the page to avoide the copyright problems? Joaquin Murietta 23:56, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Every website is specifically copyright protected unless they explicitly release the information to public domain and/or GFDL. With no copyright claim, copyright is assumed. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:22, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Definitely odd. Apparently has H.M. The Queen as patron!!! Dlyons493 Talk 19:32, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Osomec 21:31, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- We can't keep copyright violations. Since nobody bothered to list it as such, I have done so. Case closed. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:26, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- I rewrote it at: Historical Association/Temp Not sure about the second sentence. Comments por favor? Joaquin Murietta 00:04, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- I withdraw based on above. Joaquin, if you'd like to close this please do and place your text in place. Marskell 22:18, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.