Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hipinion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. · Katefan0(scribble) 17:59, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hipinion

This is a short stub on a webforum with an Alexa rank of 460000. At the moment, the website is down altogether. Pilatus 20:54, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Note The forum is now up again, and the invitation for the hordes of vandals/sockpuppets is here: [1] Pilatus 21:16, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, it is continously vandalized. ReyBrujo 23:48, 18 September 2005 (UTC) this is the original comment left by User:ReyBrujo
  • The site is currently up. No need to delete. UserA8 15:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC) (this comment left by anonymous user 12.160.79.254)
  • Keep, or at worst merge with Pitchfork Media as Hipinion is both influential and part of the notable e-mag's history. Triped 20:24, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, it is a worthwhile entry. ReyBrujo 23:48, 18 September 2005 (UTC)this comment left by anonymous user 151.203.96.36
  • Keep, If only to reveal that Nathan's server incompetence and webmaster inadequacies mirror those of his sex life. this comment left by anonymous user 151.203.96.36 this comment left by User:Johnypants (contributions), who registered on September 19
  • Delete. I get only 722 google hits for 'hipinion'. That plus the low Alexa rating tell me that this is not notable enough for an article. Also, it appears that everybody interested in the page is only interested in it for its humor or vandalism potential. Bunchofgrapes 22:32, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn forum. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:27, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. IceKarmaॐ 04:45, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, forum with 2253 registered users. Punkmorten 15:55, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete nn. Dottore So 16:24, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, Pilatus is a Hipinion poster angry because of comments made on the board. He wishes to delete this entry only because of his bitterness. pteranodon 13:46, 20 September 2005 (UTC) this is the original comment left by User:pteranodonThis comment in fact left by anonymous users 129.170.92.86 and 166.77.6.4
  • Keep, the logic that it's poor alexa rank makes it unworthy of article is unfair do to the fact that the community has existed in various locations. User Triped offers a valid alternative to deletion. Tim Helmuth 04:09, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Yes. Since I see that shut-in deletionists shall again have their way, I am going to go ahead and add to the Pitchfork article. Any board with so many published authors, singer/songwriters, and music editors contributing is worth a mention on Wikipedia. Triped 21:38, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
    • User's 6th edit. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:51, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
      • So what? Why don't you make a proper contribution to this encyclopedia instead of picking holes in newbies contributions. --209.68.139.10 13:22, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
        • My contributions speak for themselves. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:11, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, does not need an article here. It's self-contained in Hipinion --Vsion 04:49, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.