Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu Youth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. нмŵוτнτ 23:17, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hindu Youth

Hindu Youth (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Like this, there are hundreds of religious organization available in Western and European countries. Google hits show only its own official web source and fail to establish its notability. NAHID 08:28, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - Agree – could find no information other than site posted in article. Shoessss |  Chat  00:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete I would explain my reason for deletion, but all the information needed has already been said. Only info is on website and it seems it does not have much notability. Parent5446^{(Murder me for my actions)} 00:27, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete notabiliy unestablished per WP:ORG. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. The article currently states: "Hindu Youth" is a term often used to describe a host of youth organizations for Hindu students and young adults... That's too broad a topic to be an article under this name. The article is really about only one of those organizations, Hindu Youth Network, but only has one source, the organization's own web site. If the HYN is later established to be notable and external sources are found, an article about that particular organization could be re-created later. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:34, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:ORG. It says its events are "fun and engaging" but doesn't make clear what they actually do or whether it has any considerable impact on the rest of the world. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:53, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per Metropolitan, non-notable.--Aldux (talk) 21:40, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.