Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu Pushup

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. JeremyA 16:05, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hindu Pushup

How-to yoga position, nowhere to merge it, delete--nixie 10:20, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Re-write, perhaps re-name, but keep. We have pages on sex positions, so one on a pushup hardly seems unreasonable. Blackcats 11:05, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • I should point out that this is not a standard position, it's one made by a personal trainer/yogi, so within yoga it is not notable. --nixie 13:39, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable. JamesBurns 11:34, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Not even a standard position. I could see the lotus position having an article, but not this. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:38, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The title of the position alone could be construed as a vague or implicit religious slur. Jasonglchu 15:46, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment - If a notable and verifiable position has a name that is a vaguely or implicitly religious slur, we should still have an article on that position. -- Jonel 19:15, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment; Regardless, it's non-notable. jglc | t | c 20:08, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable. carmeld1 04:43, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Re-write, perhaps re-name, but keep. As a fitness dork, I belive that this excercise position is notable. Sorry if this vote/comment was done improperly. I have never spoke-up before. 67.167.120.201

Keep it.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.