Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilary Hahn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy keep DES ^(talk) 16:56, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hilary Hahn

Vanity article and non-notable person. Jake013 10:10, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy keep. lol non-notable person grammy winning person.--Hhielscher 10:35, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. Definitely notable. Anville 10:49, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, bad-faith nom from a user who seems to have a vendetta against violinists (a violist, perhaps)? --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 10:53, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Piccadilly 11:19, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. Also, the article could use more content at the top. -- Kjkolb 11:32, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. — JIP | Talk 12:18, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, and someone please stop User:Jake013 now. -- Egil 12:27, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. Notable violinist. Agree User:Jake013 should be stopped. -- Dlinga 13:19, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep Not sure if User:Jake013 really knows his violinists. He got Heifetz right, but surely should have moved on to Perlman or Kreisler rather than Hahn etc. Somebody stop him! Dlyons493 Talk 14:09, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. This is getting ridiculous. Incidentally, I expanded Hahn's article a little bit. Chick Bowen 15:28, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep per above.--Alhutch 15:55, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep as per WP:music. Has made several albums for Deutsche Grammophon, a highly notable classical record company and won a Grammy. I repeat my earlier advice to user Jake013 to study WP:music carefully before making any further nominations. BTW is there an admin in the house to close the debate. Capitalistroadster 16:10, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep and block the user for the bad faith nomination. --Mateusc 16:18, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.